On 23 8 2004 at 12:46 pm -0400, Corey Knafelz wrote:
What about something like this? See attached image.
Yeah, I like that, thanks. :) The problem with this type of button is how to indicate... should it simply change its image and not maintain a "pushed-in" appearance? Does the displayed image indicate the current setting, or the setting you effect by pushing the button? Right now the loop button (adjacent) isa push-in type; having two different behaviours adjacent would lead to confusion. The corrollary would be to have a looping/non-looping indication for the loop button and make it non-push-in, but is that really an improvement? -b (yippee, UI design philosophy) -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca