Re: [Doggiebox] Relevance of time signature?

On 10-Feb-2005 23:55, Mike wrote:

I don't use the time signature as it's intended, at least I don¹t think so. I get my rhythms through trial and error, usually. The only problem I foresee is a marketing issue, really. Should Doggiebox be perceived as incapable of handling conventional time signatures?

I guess I'm kind of here, too. I'm not very good at counting rhythms from time signature, but I have a working understanding of what they mean and they are a useful reference -- and pretty widespread! Best to leave them in. I mean, I've never found the idea of time signature getting in the way! Cheers, Carl -- Carl Edlund Anderson http://www.carlaz.com/