Doggie Box on Leopard

Michael, I have tried it too and it behaves as you described i.e. un-useable. I also looked in the log file and saw several memory leak exceptions listed. I share your disappointment. I really love Doggie Box's user interface and had hoped, like others on this list, that additional functionality and universal binaries would be added over time. I guess the revenue flow has decreased to where Doug isn't interested anymore. Doggie Box was written as a Carbon application (judging from the log file output). So to progress forward, it would need to be made Cocoa based as a minimum. Don't know if Doug has any plans for that. However, if Doug truly views this as dead, would he consider releasing the code as open source? Doug? thanks dave
1. Doggiebox with Leopard? (Michael McFarland Watson)
Hey all,
Has anyone tried Doggiebox under the new version of Mac OS? One of my friends just installed Leopard and Doggiebox has massive audio latency issues (aka the sound skips horribly) and even when not in use it was taking up 50% of his Macbook Pro's CPU.
I use doggiebox all the time, and it would be unfortunate to lose that ability upon upgrading.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

On 29 Oct 2007, at 11:06 , David Sampson wrote:
Don't know if Doug has any plans for that. However, if Doug truly views this as dead, would he consider releasing the code as open source?
I would love to know whether Doggiebox is still a "live" development project or not. It's certainly been quiet on the updates front for a very long time! Cheers, Carl -- Carl Edlund Anderson http://www.carlaz.com/

I second this. On Oct 30, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Carl Edlund Anderson wrote:
On 29 Oct 2007, at 11:06 , David Sampson wrote:
Don't know if Doug has any plans for that. However, if Doug truly views this as dead, would he consider releasing the code as open source?
I would love to know whether Doggiebox is still a "live" development project or not. It's certainly been quiet on the updates front for a very long time!
Cheers, Carl

The last "news" posted on the Zygoat site is from 2006. They still list Doggiebox as their "flagship" software product, although the company does seem to have other focuses as well. Likewise, the DB site lists the latest news as 2006. ---- corey knafelz <corey.knafelz@gmail.com> wrote:
I second this.
On Oct 30, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Carl Edlund Anderson wrote:
On 29 Oct 2007, at 11:06 , David Sampson wrote:
Don't know if Doug has any plans for that. However, if Doug truly views this as dead, would he consider releasing the code as open source?
I would love to know whether Doggiebox is still a "live" development project or not. It's certainly been quiet on the updates front for a very long time!
Cheers, Carl
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zygoat Doggiebox discussion list - <http://www.doggiebox.com> To unsubscribe, view archives or change your options: <http://lists.zygoat.ca/mailman/listinfo/doggiebox>
participants (4)
-
Carl Edlund Anderson
-
corey knafelz
-
David Sampson
-
mcarlyleï¼ charter.net