I would have to Second this. What's the point of using a drum sequencer if I have to go back and clean up after it. This would make me use something different for drum editing. I like Doggie Box, but I think that it needs a lot more features to be the versatile drum sequencer of choice for producers (in the dance genre anyway). For me it's a little too simplistic. Adding more options to the UI would be totally welcome for me as long as they are intelligible and useful. One of the big things for me aside from timing (which is very important as I sequence in Cubase with 16 measure loops) is velocity. I know that I can set up a kit with differing velocities, but making this kit and then having to switch switch drums from the drum menu is a little tedious to me and I end up just using Reason. There are things about Reason that bug me ( I HATE the sequencer) and if DoggieBox gets to the point where it is easy to use with all the option I need I will use it for my drum sequencing instead of just an experimentation pad as I do now. I'm hoping that it will, and that's why I'm on the litserv. respectfully, Doug On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Andrew Frank wrote:
I'd vote for either the preference/toggle, or the exact length. My gut feel is that the exact length export (add extra bars to hear the tail) is the most "works as expected" method. -Andrew
On Oct 30, 2003, at 10:13 AM, Ben Kennedy wrote:
I'd like to see what popular opinion is on this -- what do other people think?
In general, my desire is to avoid creating a new toggle option (making the interface more complex) unless it really adds value. x